The science of power naps

supersonicelectronic:

Sean Norvet.

Paintings by the always unique Sean Norvet.

Read More

  1. Camera: Nikon D5000
  2. Aperture: f/5.6
  3. Exposure: 1/80th
  4. Focal Length: 48mm

Again, excellent content from PBS. Looking forward to watching the rest,

curiositycounts:

New PBS Off Book episode explores the evolution of music online and the rising importance of curation and collaboration. Previous episodes have covered typography, generative art, product design, papercraft, artist fashion, steampunk,  and visual culture online.

"[N]umbers (and all mathematical ideas, for that matter) have lives of their own. We can’t control them. Even though they exist in our minds, once we decide what we mean by them we have no say in how they behave. They obey certain laws and have certain properties, personalities, and ways of combining with one another, and there’s nothing we can do about it except watch and try to understand. In that sense they are eerily reminiscent of atoms and stars, the things of this world, which are likewise subject to laws beyond our control … except that those things exist outside our heads."

Steven Strogatz, 2010

A section from the 1st of a 15-part New York Times series, The Elements of Math: Beginning with a column on why numbers are helpful, he goes on to investigate topics including negative numbers, calculus and group theory, finishing with the mysteries of infinity.

(via Good)

Album Art

interesting. plus he includes some insights into his process. and gems like:

“I’ve read enough academic material to know that I’m not the only bullshit artist out there. I think about how Dickens got paid per word and how, as a result, Bleak House is … well, let’s be diplomatic and say exhaustive. Dickens is a role model for me.”

laphamsquarterly:

Remember that amazing essay in the Chronicle Review of Higher Education by that anonymous author who writes college term papers and dissertations for a living? (Hint: we put it in the “Lines of Work” issue.) Then let us remind you:

You would be amazed by the incompetence of your students’ writing. I have seen the word “desperate” misspelled every way you can imagine. And these students truly are desperate. They couldn’t write a convincing grocery list, yet they are in graduate school. They really need help. They need help learning and, separately, they need help passing their courses. But they aren’t getting it.

Well the latest LQ podcast is an interview with that author, the pseudonymous Ed Dante, who talks with us about his career in the college-paper-writing business and the problems in American higher education.

Played 360 times.

love love NPR…

sirmitchell:

watch this: Why Can’t We Walk Straight?

(Source: sirmitchell)

NPR -  Children’s play has becomes increasingly scripted, limiting their ability or tendency towards improvised, imaginative play. This then effects their development of executive functions including their ability to self-regulate. “Kids with good self-regulation are able to control their emotions and behavior, resist impulses, and exert self-control and discipline.”

Played 10 times.

The basic facts amount to this: dingbats are what people call typographic ornamentations. The term is said to have been coined in 1904. People first started using dingbats as spacers in typesetting. This was thought to help large blocks of text feel less solid. Depending on the context, dingbats were used to lift a block of text up with humour, to decorate a block of text or even to make the text seeming more sombre.

As it turns out, a dingbat (that’s in the singular, not plural) is a whole different bag. A dingbat is one of those boxy, stucco-front, 2-3 storey buildings you find all across Southern California. While we have nothing against boxy stucco front 2-3 storey buildings in Southern California, our main interest here is in the idea of dingbats as typographic symbols.

We’ve searched high and low to find out exactly who first used dingbats, who named them, how they’re used, to what end and why. There are two stories we’d like to believe are true and they go something like this:

The first story is short, but nice. According to some, the word dingbat started being used because it made the sound a linotype machine makes while it’s printing. Ding. Bat. –– Ding. Bat. –– Ding. Bat. The amazing thing is, once you see and hear it in this way, the more likely this seems.

The other story is about a daily comic strip called The Dingbat Family. Members of the family were: Mr. E. Pluribus Dingbat, a short office clerk and his wife Mrs. Minnie Dingbat. Minnie, despite her name, was actually really big and towered over her husband. Mr. and Mrs. Dingbat had three kids: their son Cicero, a daughter Imogene, and our personal favourite: the dingbat baby who had no name. The strip is all about the family and what they get up to in their New York apartment, and how Mr. Dingbat becomes especially obsessed with the neighbours upstairs. The Dingbat Family comic strip ran from 1910 to 1916 and was George Herriman’s creation (the same Herriman that later became famous for the Krazy Kat comics).

(find this post here)

bobulate:

Allan Metcalf on the story of America’s greatest word, “OK:”

“OK,” Metcalf writes in an introduction, “is said to be the most frequently spoken (or typed) word on the planet, bigger even than an infant’s first word ma or the ubiquitous Coke. … It’s America’s answer to Shakespeare. It’s an entire philosophy expressed in two letters.”

Metcalf devotes almost half of OK to the word’s curious history:

The late Allen Walker Read (1906-2002), whom Metcalf calls a “scholar without equal of American English,” discovered the first recorded use of OK in the March 23, 1839, edition of the Boston Morning Post, where it appeared as “o.k.,” with a clarifying “all correct” immediately following. Actually, “o.k.” stood for “oll korrect”: There was a craze in the late 1830s not just for abbreviations but for abbreviations of mangled spellings. Of these faddish coinages, only OK and “the three R’s” (reading, ’riting, and ’rithmetic) survive.

Metcalf’s concluding chapter ends with the affirming:

OK has made tolerance more tolerable.

OK?

“You find out that you, an organism, are competing for your house with a superorganism that knows how to do nothing but compete. You are not only competing in the most basic evolutionary sense; you are competing with a purely adaptive intelligence, and so you are competing with the force of evolution itself.”

givemesomethingtoread:

You think it’d be impossible to share your house with your wife, your daughter, and fifty million or so Argentine ants. And you would be correct.

givemesomethingtoread:

New cognitive research suggests that language profoundly influences the way people see the world; a different sense of blame in Japanese and Spanish.